08.12.2006, 10:51
Meinungen zum Baker-Report:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.defensetech.org/">http://www.defensetech.org/</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.defensetech.org/">http://www.defensetech.org/</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:Everyone Hates Bakerhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...02235.html
Wow. Everyone -- and I mean everyone -- hates the Baker Commission report. "Group studies Iraq- fails to find clue bag," proclaims the conservative Blackfive milblog. "The report is a dud," sighs the lefty Americablog. And Fred Kaplan mopes:
The report of the Iraq Study Group... was doomed to fall short of expectations. But who knew it would amount to such an amorphous, equivocal grab bag.
Its outline of a new "diplomatic offensive" is so disjointed that even a willing president would be left puzzled by what precisely to do, and George W. Bush seems far from willing. Its scheme for a new military strategy contains so many loopholes that a president could cite its language to justify doing anything (or nothing)....
Zitat:Threats Wrapped in Misunderstandings
By Sudarsan Raghavan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Thursday, December 7, 2006; Page A01
BAGHDAD, Dec. 6 -- The Iraq Study Group's prescriptions hinge on a fragile Iraqi government's ability to achieve national reconciliation and security at a time when the country is fractured along sectarian lines, its security forces are ineffective and competing visions threaten to collapse the state, Iraqi politicians and analysts said Wednesday.
They said the report is a recipe, backed by threats and disincentives, that neither addresses nor understands the complex forces that fuel Iraq's woes. They described it as a strategy largely to help U.S. troops return home and resurrect America's frayed influence in the Middle East. ...