12.03.2025, 12:43
Um Helios letzten Post hier zu ergänzen:
aus : https://www.twz.com/air/you-dont-need-a-...rted-f-35s
"While the F-35 might not have an explicit ‘kill switch’ feature, the program down to its very core, at least currently, creates significant and historically worrisome dependencies for the majority of Joint Strike Fighter operators. The aircraft requires constant support from a supply chain and just-in-time logistics concept that already has raised massive concerns. So many of its key features being tied to ALIS/ODIN only exacerbate these concerns. But really, the F-35 is just the proverbial canary in the geopolitical coal mine. "
Man braucht keinen kill-switch, weil ohne kontinuierlichen US-Support die Fähigkeiten der F-35 immer weiter zurückgehen.
Weiterhin ergänzend aus dem text:
"“On F-35 fears, I get it – there is real dependency,” Senior Research Fellow for Airpower and Military Technology at the (RUSI) think tank in the United Kingdom, wrote on X yesterday. “But if all your targeting capacity, BLOS [beyond-line-of-sight] comms, penetrating/orbital ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] and the munitions you assume you’d fight with in a war are U.S.-provided; then dependency on the U.S. for MDFs [Mission Data Files] and ALIS/ODIN for F-35 isn’t your main problem.”
aus : https://www.twz.com/air/you-dont-need-a-...rted-f-35s
"While the F-35 might not have an explicit ‘kill switch’ feature, the program down to its very core, at least currently, creates significant and historically worrisome dependencies for the majority of Joint Strike Fighter operators. The aircraft requires constant support from a supply chain and just-in-time logistics concept that already has raised massive concerns. So many of its key features being tied to ALIS/ODIN only exacerbate these concerns. But really, the F-35 is just the proverbial canary in the geopolitical coal mine. "
Man braucht keinen kill-switch, weil ohne kontinuierlichen US-Support die Fähigkeiten der F-35 immer weiter zurückgehen.
Weiterhin ergänzend aus dem text:
"“On F-35 fears, I get it – there is real dependency,” Senior Research Fellow for Airpower and Military Technology at the (RUSI) think tank in the United Kingdom, wrote on X yesterday. “But if all your targeting capacity, BLOS [beyond-line-of-sight] comms, penetrating/orbital ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] and the munitions you assume you’d fight with in a war are U.S.-provided; then dependency on the U.S. for MDFs [Mission Data Files] and ALIS/ODIN for F-35 isn’t your main problem.”