22.04.2013, 23:46
Es ging im Post von 701 um das Guantanamoverfahren. Boston wurde nichtmal angesprochen.
Hier nochmal der eng. Link: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/29/3206764/guantanamo-judge-says-external.html">http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/29/3 ... ernal.html</a><!-- m -->
Und: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Intelligence_Sharing_and_Protection_Act">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Inte ... ection_Act</a><!-- m -->
Hier nochmal der eng. Link: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/29/3206764/guantanamo-judge-says-external.html">http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/29/3 ... ernal.html</a><!-- m -->
Und: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Intelligence_Sharing_and_Protection_Act">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Inte ... ection_Act</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) is a proposed law in the United States which would allow for the sharing of Internet traffic information between the U.S. government and technology and manufacturing companies. The stated aim of the bill is to help the U.S government investigate cyber threats and ensure the security of networks against cyberattacks....
CISPA has been criticized by advocates of Internet privacy and civil liberties, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, Fight for the Future, and Avaaz.org, as well as various conservative and libertarian groups including the Competitive Enterprise Institute, TechFreedom, FreedomWorks, Americans for Limited Government, Liberty Coalition, and the American Conservative Union. Those groups argue CISPA contains too few limits on how and when the government may monitor a private individual’s Internet browsing information. Additionally, they fear that such new powers could be used to spy on the general public rather than to pursue malicious hackers....