Russland

[Kosmos]

Naja, beispielsweise beim Aufstand von Warschau, in denen die nicht-kommunistischen polnische Kräfte seitens der Sowjets entweder durch unterlassene Hilfeleistung oder durch Blockade amerikanischer Hilfe marginalisiert wurden.

Wahrheitsgehalt dieser Beschuldigungen ist sehr umstritten.

.............
ich denke es passt hier rein.
Ich finde in folgenden Artikel werden einige Interessante Sachen angesprochen:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/08/26/why-is-our-russia-policy-so-foolish/">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/08 ... o-foolish/</a><!-- m -->

Why Is Our Russia Policy So Foolish?
Posted on August 26th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
The underlying problem is that the Cold War generation of U.S. Russian experts has been supplanted by the post-Cold War generation, now grown to maturity and authority. If the Cold warriors were forged in the 1960s, the post-Cold warriors are forever caught in the 1990s. They believed that the 1990s represented a stable platform from which to reform Russia, and that the grumbling of Russians plunged into poverty and international irrelevancy at that time is simply part of the post-Cold War order. They believe that without economic power, Russia cannot hope to be an important player on the international stage. That Russia has never been an economic power even at the height of its influence but has frequently been a military power doesn’t register. Therefore, they are constantly expecting Russia to revert to its 1990s patterns, and believe that if Moscow doesn’t, it will collapse — which explains U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s interview in The Wall Street Journal where he discussed Russia’s decline in terms of its economic and demographic challenges. Obama’s key advisers come from the Clinton administration, and their view of Russia — like that of the Bush administration — was forged in the 1990s........