Iranisches Atomprogramm

[Shahab3]

Hat das also ein übergelaufener Diplomat -der selbstverständlich unerkannt bleiben möchte- behauptet ... Was der wohl dafür gekriegt hat ? Asyl ? :rofl:

------------
Zum Aktuellen Stand der Verhandlungen mal die Stimmen der verantwortlichen Verhandlungsführer auf iranischer Seite :


<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=163450">http://www.mehrnews.com/en/NewsDetail.a ... sID=163450</a><!-- m -->

U.S. is EU’s main problem: Nasseri

TEHRAN, Mar. 6 (MNA) -- The European Union needs sufficient time to convince the United States to alter its hostile attitude and stop its insistence on halting Iran’s uranium enrichment program, as well as to offer some political and economic suggestions meant to help resolve the issue, Sirus Nasseri, the head of the Iranian delegation of the Iran-EU nuclear working group said on Sunday.
...
Nasseri added, “The Europeans are likely to reach a compromise solution. Although we have not progressed in the nuclear fuel cycle, it is still too early to make judgments about the issue. That is to say, we should wait for the strategic talks.”

Nasseri said that Iran did not expect a miracle, adding that the political situation would allow the EU to propose another option besides stopping uranium enrichment activities.
...
(!!)
Commenting on reports that the EU big three had offered to help Iran join the World Trade Organization (WTO) and purchase planes, Nasseri stated that it is quite clear to the Europeans that Iran’s legitimate right to conduct nuclear activities can not be exchanged for certain political or trade privileges.

He added, “The United States is Europe’s main problem. The Europeans say, ‘Give us a chance, because in the current difficult situation and with the U.S. pressure, we can not reach an alternative solution.’ And we say in response that if you intend to take a step toward reaching an agreement, do it as fast as possible, because according to the Paris Pact, our deadline is the end of March.”(!!)
...

.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=30182&NewsKind=Current%20Affairs">http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleVi ... %20Affairs</a><!-- m -->

Iran's Rohani rebukes US hypocritical policy

LONDON, March 6 (IranMania) - The senior nuclear official Hassan Rowhani said on Saturday that US President George Bush terms the 'Zionist regime' as a real democracy in the region while it violates the human rights and possess weapons of mass destruction. "Israel has not signed up any international treaties and conventions related to the WMD.
...
The debate of disarmament would be meaningful when all countries are treated without any bias, he stressed, adding that Iran has proposed the Middle East free from the weapons of mass destruction.

Having Airbus planes or membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) are not as much important (for Iran) as it has been propagated", said Rowhani when a reporter asked the US incentives to Iran should Iran suspend the uranium enrichment. Meanwhile, Rowhani reiterated that Iran is after joining the WTO and the hue and cry raised by the US is purely out of politics.
...
On the possible US attack on Iran, he criticized the American neo conservatives who" act first and then think about their actions." "The US has enmity against Iran and is not willing to see that Iran-Europe talks continue", he said adding that some important relations will be established should the talks succeed.

"Some of the European ministers told me explicitly in Brussels that they are not only after resolving Iran`s nuclear case peacefully but also making strategic relations with Iran", said Rowhani.

.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=30208&NewsKind=CurrentAffairs">http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleVi ... entAffairs</a><!-- m -->

'Uranium enrichment on Iran's agenda in future'

LONDON, March 6 (IranMania) - Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi on Sunday stressed that uranium enrichment will definitely be on Iran`s agenda in the future.

Addressing domestic and foreign journalists during his weekly press briefing, he added that the issue (of uranium enrichment) is Iran`s decisive red line.(!!)

On the US threats against Iran, he said, "We are not willing to see Iran`s nuclear dossier is sent to the UN Security Council but we will not be concerned even if the case is sent to the world body," IRNA reported.

If the US, Europe or any other country thinks that by making such threats Iran may ignore its legitimate rights, it is making a big mistake, Asefi noted.

"We have repeatedly announced, in our talks with the European countries, that any halt to uranium enrichment is not at all accepted by Iran," he said, adding that the Europeans should not think that by prolonging negotiations with Iran, Tehran will forget its objectives.
...

Somit scheinen die Positionen auf beiden Seiten klar, obgleich unvereinbar.
Wie soll man sich da einigen ? Zwischen "Anreichern : Ja" und "Anreichern: Nein" liegt höchstens "Bischen Anreichern.."

Also ich sehe schwarz...