16.10.2004, 15:39
Danke Skywalker :daumen: Ich zitiere mal die interessanten Stellen :
Zitat:"For a start, Iran has many installations scattered over its huge territory, and they are protected. The main military site, at Natanz in central Iran, is buried deep underground," the British weekly said in its main cover story.Darf ich mich also in meinen Aussage bestätigt sehen ?!?
It suggested that even if bombing Bushehr, one plant on the verge of completion, were feasible (with Russian technicians working there moved out of the way), "it would bring about huge retaliation while chalking up only limited military gains."
"And Iran, unlike Iraq, has many means of retaliation, directly against Israel and indirectly against US interests in Iraq and elsewhere," the New Statesman further warned.
It also believed that America's onslaught against with Iraq and Afghanistan have put Iran at the "heart of the world's most sensitive region, giving it ample opportunity for good or for mischief."
